Investing to Solve Problems

I started this blog with the intention of finding a way to define why and how I invest money. I’ve known my whole life that I am an investor and that I truly enjoy investing, but I’ve never really known why. I hoped that by writing to this blog regularly I’d find out. The funny thing was that I actually found out when I just let it sit and bubble for a bit, without any writing.

Here is the first draft of my beliefs, I’ll spend the rest of my life redefining and enhancing these:

1) I believe that investors are faced with a choice of investments generally split into two categories: finding loopholes or solving problems.

Most investors, both these days and over time (you should have a read of some of my older investment books, you’d laugh), have been focused on finding a method for outwitting the rest of the investors. It usually works for a very short time until the ‘trick’ proves to just be a magical coincidence or the rest of the market figures it out. Either way, it blows up or stops producing and the investor goes running for the next trick.

A few investors search for major problems and then figure out who is solving those problems. They vote for  the company they think that has the best solution by giving them money and then they trust the company and wait for the payoff. Some people believe this is the buy and hold strategy, but in fact that isn’t always the case. With many companies the problem/solution event happens in a relatively short period of time (six months to five years) and then they have to find another problem to solve faster than their competitors. Just investing in the team once without evaluating the investment can get you into a lot of trouble.

2) I believe that investing in the solving of important problems is the most profitable investment over time because it’s sustainable and has built in demand.

When a major issue affects society, people are willing to pay whatever it takes to get the problem solved. If a company anticipates a problem and develops a solution in time to fix the problem, they’ll be highly compensated because what they’re doing is incredibly valuable. For example, one major problem affecting the United States right now is that our infrastructure is crumbling right under us. Bridges are getting close to collapse, sewer systems and water mains are about to burst, our interstate system is full of cracks and potholes, levees are dangerously misengineered, and our electric grid is getting old. The cost to fix all of those problems is well outside of our ability to pay for it, using current technologies. But if a new technology for even one of these problems was developed that lowered the cost of fixing the problem to a managable level, the company that developed the technology would make a fortune.

3) I believe that adaquately defining problems and their effects helps investors find problems worth solving (investing in). A problem well defined is a problem half solved.

Most of the time investments go to problems that are well understood, fashionable, or within a domain that the investor understands. This is because the process of really understanding the problems affecting a given area, comparing the effects of each problem and the smaller problems that make up the larger problem is an incredible task. No one can possibly understand every factor, so we just invest in what is easy. As Warren Buffett says, he never invests in anything he doesn’t understand. My charge is that there are more problems than any investor could ever solve and we need a way to figure out what problems are affecting us most so we can direct investment money in that direction.

4) Most entrepreneurs today aren’t creating companies that solve useful problems because we don’t value them the way we should, simply because we don’t understand them yet.

We have a tendency to put off solving problems until they’re in our faces. In that case we have only moments to slap together a quick fix, hoping that will do the trick. The reason Hurricane Katrina was so devestating was because the levees broke and there was no way to patch them back up quickly. Few people had anticipated the problem and the few that did notice the problem did a terrible job of transmitting that information to the rest of us. It’s not that they are particularly bad at communication, it’s simply that there are no ways of communicating potential problems, what is causing them, and how they can be stopped. I believe that if we had a way to collect and develop essentially a ‘problems database’ then we could start to solve some of the things facing out world by inspiring people to solve problems that matter. Who really cares about getting your music streamed over the internet tin a predictive manner the way that Pandora serves it up? It’s an amazing service, but it doesn’t solve a big problem. We need to start solving big problems and investors need to start investing in big problems.

My goal: I believe that it is very worth my time to start finding a way to adequately capture problems affecting people in the world. There are tons of problems, from droughts in Africa to trash flows in the Pacific Ocean that are starting to affect people without our real understanding of how they’ll change our lives down the line. I’ll let you know how it goes, feel free to pitch in with any ideas.